Translate

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Chapter 8- Engineering: Recommended, Part 1

Activities Recommended:


  • Photography and photograph developing
  • Horse-riding
  • Food parcel packing for charity
  • Tours of caves
  • Effort to make peace with relatives
  • Homoeopathic remedy for ‘tiredness’ of mind


Photography: Of the four elemental qualities, air, fire, water and earth, engineering predominantly features the condition of the ‘earth’ – of that fixedness examinable to the material existence.



In the photographic chronicles displaying this very fixedness we find that there is little or no quality of air (etherealness); no fire (life); no water (fluidity – ongoingness, mutability etc.).




The study of photography excites both the amateur and the professional in like regard with each new depiction. We are ever amazed at the virtue and the arrogance of this impressioning before us. If we are familiar with the subjects personally that have been isolated into that stationary moment, interestingly, we are immediately compelled to review our inner impressions alongside these eternal circumstances at the time we are recalling.



“How did it feel on that day?” will be the first question that springs from within. We shall mentally try to draw together much of what we can in a few moments to complete the ‘picture’ and add to its statement of existence.



Therefore this photo then becomes a springboard into more complex pictures held within our imaginative recall – the catalog of associations and deep memories which cannot of themselves, be comprehensively committed to a singular print.



As an activity we are asked to objectify the subjective experience and this is a useful example of contrast for the individual that has difficulty admitting the objective realities into his consciousness. This is not to say that the imaging in any given photograph is a wholesome or correct portrayal of a subject. However there is an inarguable element to it (providing it has not been altered from the original of course) – being witness to an aspect of a moment as it was at one time.



Horse-riding, once again, helps the rider to admit to certain immediate objective realities and also calls him to respond to them. There is a cooperation required between both man and big beast, and it is with this cooperative effort there comes a respect for the powerful animal, and a respect for the individual in common.



Dog training does not compare here, because one can impose their will all too easily upon a dog, so that the dog mimics the trainer, rather than independently interacts.



The learned responses from a dog can satisfy an individual in that the dog becomes much of an extension of himself and owners are known to equate their own self discipline with that of their adopted pet after a while. In this relationship the two almost become as one – the dog, being but the lesser model of the other.



However, with the horse and the dear donkey there may well be an amiable compliance, yet it is that it is the animal themselves deciding this congeniality – in riding, in cart pulling, in paddock tilling – the work horse, our gracious friend, deserves acknowledgment for that which he performs willingly. He does not have an ego developing as a man would have, but he does have the capacity to make decisions about his preferences and interactions. Such an animal as the horse would rather take sick and withdraw from life entirely than be forced to succumb to a master that is cruel and distempered.



Even those beloved of beasts who walk the grain stone-milling circuit – hour after hour – do so with a love for the human company around them. 
 



It is interesting to note that the more capable an animal is of deciding ‘yea’ or ‘neigh’ in that which it has its mind to, the more it can respond in loving kind to the people around it. A beast of the wild is too compelled by its carnal instincts to ‘decide’ its relationships accordingly, whilst the domesticated pet is too compelled by the will of the owner to ‘decide’ its mind in its present state of development.


We may learn to develop our choice making, our own ‘decisions’ as long as we are not treated like a dog and expected to perform to another’s will and bidding; or given to an aggressiveness which departs the conscious effort.

In taking this responsibility of choice – finding ourselves in relation to others and respecting the ‘I’ of the ‘am’ (of both us and of them) – then so more also do we become capable of loving as well. Only in freedom do we come to mutual cooperation and then further on to this love.
 

Kissing another person, mouth to mouth, and exposing each to the other’s breath as well as the fluids, is an extreme and deliberate test of tolerance and mutuality of egos. Having said that, we may all understand too readily that it is not by such kissing that we are enabled to meet with the bulk of humanity. In point of fact, as poignant a discovery as it may be, there are little or no folk we should wish to endeavor this ‘testing’ with comfortably. And so, one could say that even though the efficacy of this method is assured, it is not one in which we could share universally.



Such discriminatory processes can be over-keenly receptive and similar to us trying to appreciate the tuba’s playing with our ears held right up to the very opening. It is not to say that we do not share great and glorious affinities with those around us, but we do have perimeters to differences that co-exist amongst the splendid qualities shared that would speak too loudly at close range.


At the opposite to this ‘close range’ can be found the type of love and intimacy which is expressed to the fellow/s whom we do not ever even meet with. The type of charity as is expressed through the food parcel packing is one where we are not given the personal result or appreciation, and could not be further away from the other with which we are sharing a relationship.
 

The dynamic of this kindness of giving is swift and purposeful. There is nonetheless a true relationship between the charitable man and his receiver, even without the acknowledgment from either … and the parcel which is provided in this way, not only gives to the individual receiving, but the world as a whole as well.

Therefore, this is a different form of practicality we can come to in our understandings within the workings of the world, finding that the results of what we do, do not have to be realized by us for them to have a profound effect in many realms, in many ways. We can be both cautioned and encouraged in this. We can discover just how many ways we can enhance the physical conditions here anonymously and find satisfaction, most curiously.

Continued...

4 comments:

Michael said...


Augustine's Sermon 227 is just one of several early Christian primary sources, both textual and iconographic (i.e., in works of art) providing clear evidence that the "kiss of peace" as practiced in the Christian liturgy was customarily exchanged for the first several centuries, not mouth to cheek, but mouth to mouth (note that men were separated from women during the liturgy) for, as the primary sources also show, this is how early Christians believed Christ and his followers exchanged their own kiss. For example, In his Paschale carmen (ca. 425-50), Latin priest-poet Sedulius condemns Judas and his betrayal of Christ with a kiss thus, "And leading that sacrilegious mob with its menacing swords and spikes, you press your mouth against his, and infuse your poison into his honey?"[3] The kiss of peace was known in Greek from an early date as eirḗnē (εἰρήνη) ("peace", which became pax in Latin and peace in English).[4] The source of the peace greeting is probably from the common Hebrew greeting shalom; and the greeting "Peace be with you" is similarly a translation of the Hebrew shalom aleichem. In the Gospels, both greetings were used by Jesus - e.g. Luke 24:36; John 20:21, 20:26. The Latin term translated as "sign of peace" is simply pax ("peace"), not signum pacis ("sign of peace") nor osculum pacis ("kiss of peace"). So the invitation by the deacon, or in his absence by the priest, "Let us offer each other the sign of peace", is in Latin: Offerte vobis pacem ("Offer each other peace" or "Offer each other the peace"). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss_of_peace

Michael said...

The kiss is more intimate than the handshake.

"The kiss of peace is a traditional Christian greeting dating to early Christianity.

"The practice remains a part of the worship in traditional churches, including the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Catholic Churches, Eastern Orthodox churches, Oriental Orthodox churches and some liturgical mainline Protestant denominations, where it is often called the kiss of peace, sign of peace, or simply peace or pax. It is practiced as a part of worship in many Anabaptist heritage groups including Old German Baptist Brethren, and Apostolic Christian.

It was the widespread custom in the ancient western Mediterranean for men to greet each other with a kiss on the cheek. That was also the custom in ancient Judea and practiced also by Christians. In the Gospels, greeting with a kiss was also the custom practiced by Jesus.

However, the New Testament's reference to a holy kiss (en philemati hagio) and kiss of love (en philemati agapēs) transformed the character of the act beyond a greeting. Such a kiss is mentioned five times in the New Testament:

Romans 16:16 — "Greet one another with a holy kiss"
I Corinthians 16:20 — "Greet one another with a holy kiss"
II Corinthians 13:12 — "Greet one another with a holy kiss"
I Thessalonians 5:26 — "Greet all the brothers with a holy kiss"
I Peter 5:14 — "Greet one another with a kiss of love"

The writings of the early church fathers speak of the holy kiss, which they call "a sign of peace", which was already part of the Eucharistic liturgy, occurring after the Lord's Prayer in the Roman Rite and the rites directly derived from it. St. Augustine, for example, speaks of it in one of his Easter Sermons:

Then, after the consecration of the Holy Sacrifice of God, because He wished us also to be His sacrifice, a fact which was made clear when the Holy Sacrifice was first instituted, and because that Sacrifice is a sign of what we are, behold, when the Sacrifice is finished, we say the Lord's Prayer which you have received and recited. After this, the 'Peace be with you’ is said, and the Christians embrace one another with the holy kiss. This is a sign of peace; as the lips indicate, let peace be made in your conscience, that is, when your lips draw near to those of your brother, do not let your heart withdraw from his. Hence, these are great and powerful sacraments.

Michael said...

The kiss of Judas was lips to lips, and in the first several centuries the "kiss of peace" "as practiced in the Christian liturgy was customarily exchanged for the first several centuries, not mouth to cheek, but mouth to mouth (note that men were separated from women during the liturgy) for, as the primary sources also show, this is how early Christians believed Christ and his followers exchanged their own kiss".

Michael said...

Here's St. Augustine on the subject:
"Then, after the consecration of the Holy Sacrifice of God, because He wished us also to be His sacrifice, a fact which was made clear when the Holy Sacrifice was first instituted, and because that Sacrifice is a sign of what we are, behold, when the Sacrifice is finished, we say the Lord's Prayer which you have received and recited. After this, the 'Peace be with you’ is said, and the Christians embrace one another with the holy kiss. This is a sign of peace; as the lips indicate, let peace be made in your conscience, that is, when your lips draw near to those of your brother, do not let your heart withdraw from his. Hence, these are great and powerful sacraments."